翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Lower Caversham
・ Lower Cayuga First Nation
・ Lower Cedar Point Light
・ Lower Central Province
・ Lower Chanceford Township, York County, Pennsylvania
・ Lower Chandler Pond
・ Lower Chattahoochee Regional Airport
・ Lower Chehalis language
・ Lower Chenab Canal
・ Lower Chichester Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania
・ Lower Chicksgrove
・ Lower Chindwin
・ Lower Chinook
・ Lower Chittering, Western Australia
・ Lower Church
Lower Churchill Project
・ Lower Circular Road cemetery
・ Lower City
・ Lower City (disambiguation)
・ Lower Clapton
・ Lower Clarks Harbour, Nova Scotia
・ Lower class
・ Lower Class Brats
・ Lower Class Crucifixion
・ Lower Clicker
・ Lower Clydach River
・ Lower Clyde River, Nova Scotia
・ Lower Coastal Plain (Georgia)
・ Lower Colorado River Authority
・ Lower Colorado River Valley


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Lower Churchill Project : ウィキペディア英語版
Lower Churchill Project
The Lower Churchill Project is a planned hydroelectric project in Labrador, Canada, to develop the remaining 35 per cent of the Churchill River that has not already been developed by the Churchill Falls Generating Station. The Lower Churchill's two installations at Gull Island and Muskrat Falls will have a combined capacity of over 3,074 MW and have the ability to provide 16.7 TWh of electricity per year.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Lower Churchill Project )
==Overview==
Further development of the Churchill River in central Labrador was planned for after the Churchill Falls Generating Station opened in 1972. However, the government of Québec refused to allow exports of electricity through its territory. The Lower Churchill Project passed an environmental assessment in 1980, but the project was postponed indefinitely due to concerns over market access to Hydro-Québec's electricity transmission system and financing.
According to former Premier Brian Tobin, as Labrador borders Québec, when an agreement was being negotiated to sell the power generated at Churchill Falls, the power had to be sold to an entity within Québec or pass through Québec. The government of Québec refused to allow power to be transferred through Québec and would accept a contract only if the power was sold to Québec.
Because of this monopsony situation, Hydro-Québec received very favourable terms on the power sale contract. The contract was negotiated to run for a 40-year timespan, running until the year 2016,and then automatically renewing for 25 more years at a discounted rate. According to former Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams, Hydro-Québec reaps profits from the Upper Churchill contract of approximately $1.7 billion per year, while Newfoundland and Labrador receives $63 million a year.
According to long-time Hydro-Québec critic Claude Garcia, the former president of Standard Life (Canada) and author of a recent assessment of the utility commissioned by the Montreal Economic Institute, if Hydro-Québec had to pay market prices for the low-cost power it received from the Churchill Falls project in Labrador, the 2007 profit would be an estimated 75% lower.
According to the government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Hydro-Québec has reaped more than $19 billion in profits while Newfoundland has received only $1 billion in revenues from the Churchill Falls project. Québec refused to renegotiate the project, which expire only in 2041. Due to the coercion involved in that deal, Newfoundland and Labrador has sought an alternate route for the Lower Churchill Project that bypasses Québec.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Lower Churchill Project」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.